issue_comments
1 row where user = 6426942 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
875974272 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2007#issuecomment-875974272 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2007 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NTk3NDI3Mg== | mdgoldberg 6426942 | 2021-07-07T22:23:31Z | 2021-07-07T22:24:11Z | NONE | Hello! First of all, thanks so much for those of you who contribute to xarray, I've found it super useful as an n-dimensional extension of pandas! I was just wondering what the current state of this issue is? I'm running into exactly the issue described in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4743 which seems like a bug; that issue was closed as a dupe of this. Are we just waiting for someone to implement something here, or are there other blockers? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
rolling: allow control over padding 307783090 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1