issue_comments
11 rows where user = 5308236 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- mschrimpf · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1497928848 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6836#issuecomment-1497928848 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6836 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZSJSQ | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2023-04-05T18:23:51Z | 2023-04-05T18:23:51Z | NONE | Is there hope for groupby working on multi-indexed DataArrays again in the future? We -- and from the issue history it looks like others too -- are currently pinning |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby(multi-index level) not working correctly on a multi-indexed DataArray or DataSet 1318992926 | |
1312207609 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7282#issuecomment-1312207609 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7282 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ONrL5 | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2022-11-11T21:32:42Z | 2022-11-11T21:32:42Z | NONE | This error occurs in versions |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby and mean on a MultiIndex level raises ValueError 1445905299 | |
720612094 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2537#issuecomment-720612094 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2537 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyMDYxMjA5NA== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2020-11-02T17:24:32Z | 2020-11-02T17:24:32Z | NONE | still relevant |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
single coordinate is overwritten with dimension by set_index 376953925 | |
480379773 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1554#issuecomment-480379773 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1554 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDM3OTc3Mw== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2019-04-05T18:35:12Z | 2019-04-05T18:35:12Z | NONE | Any updates on this by any chance? (now that there seems to be progress on #1603) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
TypeError on DataArray.stack() if any of the dimensions to be stacked has a MultiIndex 255597950 | |
435676969 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2537#issuecomment-435676969 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2537 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNTY3Njk2OQ== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-11-04T15:04:03Z | 2018-12-01T20:06:11Z | NONE | I think the issue stems from this line of code. Removing it leads to the desired MultiIndex. But I'm not sure if it leads to downstream issues, e.g selecting over coord1 then seems to also squeeze that dimension. Perhaps @benbovy and @jhamman can chime in as the owners of that line. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
single coordinate is overwritten with dimension by set_index 376953925 | |
435560123 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2537#issuecomment-435560123 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2537 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNTU2MDEyMw== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-11-03T04:37:52Z | 2018-11-03T04:37:52Z | NONE | I would expect the dimension to become a MultiIndex with a single coordinate:
When there is more than one coordinate that is what happens, but not when there is only a single coordinate. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
single coordinate is overwritten with dimension by set_index 376953925 | |
435548784 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2537#issuecomment-435548784 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2537 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNTU0ODc4NA== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-11-03T01:04:50Z | 2018-11-03T01:12:53Z | NONE | Sorry I missed a line in the issue, added it now. You're right about the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
single coordinate is overwritten with dimension by set_index 376953925 | |
426329601 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2452#issuecomment-426329601 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2452 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNjMyOTYwMQ== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-10-02T15:58:21Z | 2018-10-02T15:58:21Z | NONE | I posted a manual solution to the multi-dimensional grouping in the stackoverflow thread.
Hopefully, |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArray.sel extremely slow 365678022 | |
426329058 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2438#issuecomment-426329058 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2438 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNjMyOTA1OA== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-10-02T15:56:53Z | 2018-10-02T15:56:53Z | NONE | I built a manual solution in the stackoverflow thread. Maybe this helps someone. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Efficient workaround to group by multiple dimensions 363629186 | |
426100334 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2452#issuecomment-426100334 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2452 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNjEwMDMzNA== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-10-01T23:47:43Z | 2018-10-02T14:29:18Z | NONE | Thanks @max-sixty, the checks per call make sense, although I still find 0.5 ms insane for a single-value lookup (python dict-indexing takes about a 50th to index every single item in the array). The reason I'm looking into this is actually multi-dimensional grouping (#2438) which is unfortunately not implemented (the above code is essentially a step towards trying to implement that). Is there a way of vectorizing these calls with that in mind? I.e. apply a method for each group. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArray.sel extremely slow 365678022 | |
424444423 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2438#issuecomment-424444423 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2438 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNDQ0NDQyMw== | mschrimpf 5308236 | 2018-09-25T18:06:11Z | 2018-09-26T13:58:02Z | NONE | Thanks @shoyer,
Your comment helped me realize that at least part of the "horribly slow" probably stems from a DataArray with MultiIndex. The above code sample takes 5-6 seconds for 1000 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Efficient workaround to group by multiple dimensions 363629186 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 6