issue_comments
2 rows where user = 25606497 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- areichmuth · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 912082889 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5760#issuecomment-912082889 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5760 | IC_kwDOAMm_X842XUfJ | areichmuth 25606497 | 2021-09-02T21:49:57Z | 2021-09-02T21:49:57Z | NONE | Thank you @TomNicholas - strangely I can't reproduce it anymore on my local machine - it all happened on our slurm. The result is correct according to the input file index. In my case I calculated annual and seasonal climate variables on the same input files, but the matrix index i,j were different. One with upper left corner (0,0) and the other one with (0,1167) - as shown in ncview. Nevertheless here is what I did - you can test it with https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/netcdf/examples/sresa1b_ncar_ccsm3-example.nc: ```python import numpy as np import xarray as xr chunks=4 lonrange=256 latrange=128 creating the chunks - our slurm can't handle dask_jobqueue and dask chunking wasnt possible as wellx=[x.tolist() for x in np.array_split(range(lonrange), chunks)] xextend = [[sublist[0],sublist[-1]] for sublist in x] y=[y.tolist() for y in np.array_split(range(latrange), chunks)] yextend = [[sublist[0],sublist[-1]] for sublist in y] concatenating the chunksallChunks = [[x,y] for x in xextend for y in yextend] for k in range(0,chunks*chunks):
combining all chunks to one final filenested inputwith xr.open_mfdataset('~/pathToFile/climateCalculations/nestedClimateAnnualCalculations_*', chunks=-1, parallel=True, engine='h5netcdf') as ds: with xr.open_mfdataset('~/pathToFile/climateCalculations/climateAnnualCalculations_*', chunks=-1, parallel=True, engine='h5netcdf') as ds: ``` |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Matrix Index is tilted using combine_by_coords 986436135 | |
| 884197067 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5604#issuecomment-884197067 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5604 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840s8bL | areichmuth 25606497 | 2021-07-21T13:38:22Z | 2021-07-21T14:33:53Z | NONE | Hi there, I have a very similar problem and before I open another issue I rather share my example here: Minimal Complete Verifiable Example: This little computation uses >500 MB of memory even if the file reveals only a size of 154MB: ```python with xr.open_dataset(climdata+'tavg_subset.nc', chunks={"latitude": 300, "longitude": 300}) as ds: print(ds)
``` My problem is that the original files are each >120GB in size and I run into out-of-memory error on our HPC (asking for 10 CPUs with 16GB each). I thought xarray processes everything in chunks for not overusing the memory - but something seems really wrong here!? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Extremely Large Memory usage for a very small variable 944996552 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 2