issue_comments
4 rows where user = 17951292 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- dgoldwx2112 · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
235742069 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/919#issuecomment-235742069 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/919 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzNTc0MjA2OQ== | dgoldwx2112 17951292 | 2016-07-27T22:32:36Z | 2016-07-27T22:32:36Z | NONE | Yes indeed. I'm embarrassed I even posted this! It looks like the nbnds and time_bnds variables were added to the yearly files at some point. Accordingly, a simple conditional checking for their existence and subsequently deleting them prior to concatenation did the trick. Too bad there is absolutely no consistency in these files at all. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
ValueError: encountered unexpected variable nbnds 167684282 | |
233504857 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/900#issuecomment-233504857 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/900 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzMzUwNDg1Nw== | dgoldwx2112 17951292 | 2016-07-19T01:17:43Z | 2016-07-19T01:17:43Z | NONE | Thanks Stephan - that was very helpful! I was able to carry out the necessary computations with no problems after seeing your reply. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
How to apply function to two (or more) variables simultaneously 166195300 | |
230284327 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/894#issuecomment-230284327 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIzMDI4NDMyNw== | dgoldwx2112 17951292 | 2016-07-04T12:56:10Z | 2016-07-04T12:56:10Z | NONE | That did the trick! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset variable reference fails after renaming 163414759 | |
229762102 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/891#issuecomment-229762102 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/891 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIyOTc2MjEwMg== | dgoldwx2112 17951292 | 2016-06-30T19:22:43Z | 2016-06-30T19:22:43Z | NONE | Thanks, Stephan! Enjoy your vacation! For now I am processing multiple files over an opendap connection using netCDF4.MFDataset and then building a DataArray or Dataset from the variables stored within the resulting MFDataset object. This appears much faster than the process recommend here when a lot of big files are involved: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/io.html (i.e., using read_netcdfs). Once a bug fix is implemented, I'll try using the dask-optimized open_mfdataset(). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: Test for dask version erroneously fails when calling xr.mfdataset() 162726984 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 4