home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

where issue = 99847237 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date)

These facets timed out: author_association, issue

user 1

  • shoyer · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
131174556 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/523#issuecomment-131174556 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/523 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzMTE3NDU1Ng== shoyer 1217238 2015-08-14T16:40:13Z 2015-08-14T16:40:13Z MEMBER

Calendar support is numpy is conceivable, but it will pretty much require fixing numpy dtypes first so that they can be parametrized and extended by third parties in Python (this is on the roadmap). Right now the datetime64 type itself is pretty buggy, in large part because it's written in C code that nobody is maintaining.

.

For pandas, I think the bigger issue is that pandas only does datetime64 with ns resolution. Simply adding us support would go a long ways toward solving this. See here for some discussion on the pandas side: https://github.com/pydata/pandas/issues/7307

On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Joe Hamman notifications@github.com wrote:

Worth? Yes. Any hope to actually get it in there? No... I think I disagree. There is almost no chance anyone outside of the climate community is going to spend time on this but, if calendar support was added in a responsible way to numpy and pandas, I don't see why they wouldn't be interested. So it will need to come from the climate users community, which IMHO, is under represented in the dev community.

If you don't want open the issue, I will.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/xray/xray/pull/523#issuecomment-131166492

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Fix datetime decoding when time units are 'days since 0000-01-01 00:00:00' 99847237
130863487 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/523#issuecomment-130863487 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/523 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzMDg2MzQ4Nw== shoyer 1217238 2015-08-13T22:11:51Z 2015-08-13T22:11:51Z MEMBER

@ocefpaf To be clear, by "strongly prefer to get this fix upstream" I mostly meant that I am reluctant to include this in xray.

I would like it to be straightforward for others to extend our reading capabilities for netcdfs by adding custom logic like this for their own equivalent of xray.open_dataset that builds on what we have in xray.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Fix datetime decoding when time units are 'days since 0000-01-01 00:00:00' 99847237
130493686 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/523#issuecomment-130493686 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/523 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEzMDQ5MzY4Ng== shoyer 1217238 2015-08-13T01:00:28Z 2015-08-13T01:00:28Z MEMBER

I would also strongly prefer to get this fix in netCDF4 upstream rather than in xray, if possible.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Fix datetime decoding when time units are 'days since 0000-01-01 00:00:00' 99847237

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 5278.668ms · About: xarray-datasette