home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where issue = 992636601 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

  • theobarnhart-USGS 2
  • andersy005 1

author_association 2

  • NONE 2
  • MEMBER 1

issue 1

  • inconsistent mean computation · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
1011731655 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5785#issuecomment-1011731655 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5785 IC_kwDOAMm_X848TczH theobarnhart-USGS 30270490 2022-01-13T03:05:25Z 2022-01-13T03:05:25Z NONE

Hi @andersy005, the only thing that I found was that I needed to convert the geotiffs to netcdf to get the computation to be consistent. I didn't trace it further so its probably best to close this.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  inconsistent mean computation 992636601
1008223975 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5785#issuecomment-1008223975 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5785 IC_kwDOAMm_X848GEbn andersy005 13301940 2022-01-09T03:51:35Z 2022-01-09T03:51:35Z MEMBER

@theobarnhart-USGS, did you find a solution and/or can we close this issue?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  inconsistent mean computation 992636601
917032342 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5785#issuecomment-917032342 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5785 IC_kwDOAMm_X842qM2W theobarnhart-USGS 30270490 2021-09-10T16:18:40Z 2021-09-10T16:18:40Z NONE

I converted the geotiffs to netCDF and the problem seems to go away. Perhaps this has to do with how NaNs are decoded from geotiffs? I also tried this workflow with the rioxarray engine 'rasterio' and had the same issue. I'll do some more testing and report back.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  inconsistent mean computation 992636601

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 1679.336ms · About: xarray-datasette