issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 987551524 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Plotting of labelled data fails · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1464348270 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5762#issuecomment-1464348270 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5762 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XSC5u | headtr1ck 43316012 | 2023-03-10T20:01:18Z | 2023-03-10T20:01:18Z | COLLABORATOR | Closing this issue in favor of #7593 since the provided MVCE in this issue now works. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plotting of labelled data fails 987551524 | |
912625730 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5762#issuecomment-912625730 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5762 | IC_kwDOAMm_X842ZZBC | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-09-03T15:33:45Z | 2021-09-03T15:55:05Z | MEMBER | I think if you try out 0.19 you'll find that this works, see #5464. I just tried your example with <s>master</s> main and it works. Though I'm not opposed to removing it, it makes sense to me to just trust the backend will do its job. But there's always some weird edge case that doesn't always make it that easy. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plotting of labelled data fails 987551524 | |
912636489 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5762#issuecomment-912636489 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5762 | IC_kwDOAMm_X842ZbpJ | dschwoerer 5637662 | 2021-09-03T15:49:40Z | 2021-09-03T15:49:40Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I tried it with master, and it failed. Trying with main worked :-D I think there will be cases where the data is not suitable for plotting, where the new error will be less clear than the old one, but I still think that would be overall an improvement. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plotting of labelled data fails 987551524 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3