issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 98587746 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1362945983 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-1362945983 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RPOe_ | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2022-12-22T15:04:31Z | 2022-12-22T15:04:31Z | MEMBER | There is another attempt to get this resolved in #7400. Any input appreciated over there. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
1308665605 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-1308665605 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85OAKcF | zoj613 44142765 | 2022-11-09T12:16:13Z | 2022-11-09T12:16:13Z | NONE | Any plans to support this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
1144845488 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-1144845488 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85EPPSw | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-06-02T13:10:04Z | 2022-06-02T13:10:04Z | MEMBER | Yes that is correct |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
1144729188 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-1144729188 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85EOy5k | Filip-K 16614296 | 2022-06-02T10:59:59Z | 2022-06-02T10:59:59Z | NONE | Hi guys! Just to clarify, this is not fixed by #3769 (which only concerns coordinates, not variables) nor by #3364 (which concerns |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
553993804 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-553993804 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1Mzk5MzgwNA== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-11-14T17:30:09Z | 2019-11-14T17:30:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok got it, I'll take a look and spin up a PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
553940815 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-553940815 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1Mzk0MDgxNQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-14T15:33:52Z | 2019-11-14T15:33:52Z | MEMBER | Thanks for tackling this very important issue @scottcha !
Instead of creating a DataArray we only need to create a I would instead try ``` python variables = [] for ds in datasets: if k in ds.variables: filled = full_like(ds.variables[k], fill_value=np.nan) break for ds in datasets: if k not in ds.variables: variables.append(filled) else: variables.append(ds.variables[k]) vars = ensure_common_dims(variables) ``` Please send in a PR with any progress you make. We are happy to help out. We have some documentation on contributing and testing here: https://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/contributing.html |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
553709888 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-553709888 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MzcwOTg4OA== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-11-14T03:37:59Z | 2019-11-14T04:09:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I just ran in to this issue. While the previous fix seems to handle one case it doesn't handle all the cases. Before I clean this up and open a new PR does this look like its on the right track (it worked for my issue where I was concating multiple datasets which always had the same dims and coordinates but sometimes were missing variables)? starts at line 353 on concat.py
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
454533741 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-454533741 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1NDUzMzc0MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-01-15T20:10:58Z | 2019-01-15T20:10:58Z | MEMBER | Closing as stale, please reopen if still relevant |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 6