issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 94966000 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
122333205 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/471#issuecomment-122333205 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyMjMzMzIwNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-17T16:27:50Z | 2015-07-17T16:27:50Z | MEMBER | Awesome, thanks! This is where you'll find the decoding logic: https://github.com/xray/xray/blob/v0.5.2/xray/conventions.py#L663 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute 94966000 | |
122332344 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/471#issuecomment-122332344 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyMjMzMjM0NA== | jjhelmus 1050278 | 2015-07-17T16:23:34Z | 2015-07-17T16:23:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sounds like a good solution. I'll work on a PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute 94966000 | |
122331414 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/471#issuecomment-122331414 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyMjMzMTQxNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-17T16:18:58Z | 2015-07-17T16:18:58Z | MEMBER | What about issuing a warning, and then decoding the duplicate values to NaN anyways? I'm usually not a fan of warnings, but my guess is that this would be the most helpful behavior for users. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute 94966000 | |
122294746 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/471#issuecomment-122294746 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyMjI5NDc0Ng== | jjhelmus 1050278 | 2015-07-17T14:30:15Z | 2015-07-17T14:30:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Yes, the two values in the missing_value attribute indicate two classes of data (not collected vs below minimum detectable threshold) and these data can be access by setting mask_and_scale=False but this also results in a valid data being returned without scaling which makes it less useful. My question is how should xray should handle these cases? Either replace all instances of the values in missing_value with NaN or raise a error message stating that multiple missing_values are not supported similar? I'd be happy to create a PR implementing either case. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute 94966000 | |
121283168 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/471#issuecomment-121283168 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/471 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyMTI4MzE2OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2015-07-14T15:32:54Z | 2015-07-14T15:32:54Z | MEMBER | You can still read these files if you set mask_and_scale=False in open_dataset -- it just won't decode the missing values for you. Arguably, we should raise an error message saying just that. From a practical perspective, are you interested in the different types of these missing values? Presumably there is some reason why they were coded differently in the first place. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read NetCDF files with multiple values in missing_value attribute 94966000 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2