issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 895842334 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
844495790 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844495790 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ5NTc5MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-05-19T21:44:22Z | 2021-05-19T21:44:22Z | MEMBER | The new version is released and works with the original example. Thank a lot @aulemahal for the issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 | |
844484466 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844484466 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ4NDQ2Ng== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-05-19T21:23:43Z | 2021-05-19T21:23:43Z | MEMBER |
TBC, no great stress — both of us should have checked whether we had tests (and the project should have had them!). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 | |
844483556 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844483556 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ4MzU1Ng== | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-05-19T21:22:12Z | 2021-05-19T21:22:12Z | MEMBER | Dask can do this nowadays:
But I suppose I was a little too eager to get this working and it felt like I got caught in plenty of tests. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 | |
844461920 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844461920 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ2MTkyMA== | aulemahal 20629530 | 2021-05-19T20:49:28Z | 2021-05-19T20:49:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm not sure I understand the "dimensions" thing, isn't the MWE 1D? What is the case where it should work? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 | |
844460269 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844460269 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ2MDI2OQ== | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-05-19T20:46:56Z | 2021-05-19T20:46:56Z | MEMBER | Yeah, reverting it for now sounds good. Unless we can easily add a single dimension check? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 | |
844450703 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5346#issuecomment-844450703 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5346 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDQ1MDcwMw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-05-19T20:32:40Z | 2021-05-19T20:32:40Z | MEMBER | That's not good. Great spot @aulemahal . We may well not have tests for multiple dimensions. We could revert this commit and release a patch release. Any thoughts @Illviljan ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fast-track unstack doesn't work with dask 895842334 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3