issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 860180906 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature to retrieve the underlying store · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 830746640 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5175#issuecomment-830746640 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5175 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMDc0NjY0MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2021-05-02T05:34:35Z | 2021-05-02T05:34:35Z | MEMBER | @skorper Could you kindly explain your use-case here? Why it is useful for you to retrieve underlying stores? :) This has never been part of Xarray's supported public API, and unless that changes the present work-around could break again in the future without warning. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature to retrieve the underlying store 860180906 | |
| 822377249 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5175#issuecomment-822377249 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5175 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMjM3NzI0OQ== | alexamici 226037 | 2021-04-19T10:56:01Z | 2021-04-19T10:56:01Z | MEMBER | @kmuehlbauer precisely. For example the What I see missing is a way defined at API level for the backends to "attach" arbitrary information and possibly code to the backend |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature to retrieve the underlying store 860180906 | |
| 822142644 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5175#issuecomment-822142644 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5175 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMjE0MjY0NA== | skorper 11022336 | 2021-04-19T03:34:38Z | 2021-04-19T03:34:38Z | NONE | Thanks @kmuehlbauer! That works great for now. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature to retrieve the underlying store 860180906 | |
| 821854599 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5175#issuecomment-821854599 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5175 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMTg1NDU5OQ== | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2021-04-17T17:04:48Z | 2021-04-17T17:04:48Z | MEMBER | @skorper So, the workaround would be something along the lines: ```python
But note, this only works if the dataset was opened/created from a single source file. And I'm not sure, if this is wanted behaviour. @alexamici can possibly answer your question, if such API would be possible. To my understanding the backend refactor also did a great deal to disentangle Datasets from the underlying data sources. Please correct me @alexamici, if I'm wrong. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature to retrieve the underlying store 860180906 | |
| 821784136 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5175#issuecomment-821784136 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5175 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMTc4NDEzNg== | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2021-04-17T07:49:41Z | 2021-04-17T07:49:41Z | MEMBER | AFAICT you could try to use But you could open the store yourself, keep the reference and load it into a Dataset. Not sure if this would work for your use case, though. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature to retrieve the underlying store 860180906 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4