issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 84127296 and user = 10194086 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- add average function · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
218413377 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/422#issuecomment-218413377 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/422 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxODQxMzM3Nw== | mathause 10194086 | 2016-05-11T09:51:29Z | 2016-05-11T09:51:29Z | MEMBER | Do we want
or
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add average function 84127296 | |
218403213 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/422#issuecomment-218403213 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/422 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxODQwMzIxMw== | mathause 10194086 | 2016-05-11T09:06:49Z | 2016-05-11T09:07:24Z | MEMBER | Sounds like a clean solution. Then we can defer handling of NaN in the weights to We may still end up implementing all required methods separately in
i.e. we use
However, I think this can not be generalized to a Additionally, |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add average function 84127296 | |
140823232 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/422#issuecomment-140823232 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/422 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MDgyMzIzMg== | mathause 10194086 | 2015-09-16T18:02:39Z | 2015-09-16T18:02:39Z | MEMBER | Thanks - that seems to be the fastest possibility. I wrote the functions for Dataset and DataArray ``` python def average_da(self, dim=None, weights=None): """ weighted average for DataArrays
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------def average_ds(self, dim=None, weights=None): """ weighted average for Datasets
``` They can be combined to one function: ``` python def average(data, dim=None, weights=None): """ weighted average for xray objects
``` Or a monkey patch:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add average function 84127296 | |
140794893 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/422#issuecomment-140794893 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/422 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE0MDc5NDg5Mw== | mathause 10194086 | 2015-09-16T16:29:22Z | 2015-09-16T16:29:32Z | MEMBER | This is has to be adjusted if there are Is there a better way to get the correct weights than:
It should probably not be used on a Dataset as every DataArray may have its own |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add average function 84127296 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1