issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 841012076 and user = 8699967 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Losing data when add a raster to a dataset · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
832696002 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-832696002 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMjY5NjAwMg== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-05-05T13:40:07Z | 2021-05-05T13:40:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Yes, the alignment stuff in there should do the trick. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 | |
832685060 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-832685060 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMjY4NTA2MA== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-05-05T13:25:23Z | 2021-05-05T13:25:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think it would be nice for xarray to have a "close enough" option where a certain number of decimal places is enough to consider them equal. Is there an issue somewhere where this is under consideration or is there an option already in existence that I missed? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 | |
832684387 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-832684387 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMjY4NDM4Nw== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-05-05T13:24:34Z | 2021-05-05T13:24:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Also related: https://github.com/corteva/rioxarray/discussions/332 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 | |
820578700 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-820578700 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMDU3ODcwMA== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-04-15T16:49:34Z | 2021-04-15T16:49:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Similarly at https://github.com/corteva/rioxarray/issues/298#issuecomment-820557568
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 | |
820575552 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-820575552 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMDU3NTU1Mg== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-04-15T16:46:15Z | 2021-04-15T16:48:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | For the original post for this issue ref:
Looks like there is a tiny difference in decimal precision. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 | |
820560634 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5075#issuecomment-820560634 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5075 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMDU2MDYzNA== | snowman2 8699967 | 2021-04-15T16:23:28Z | 2021-04-15T16:23:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Similar issue here: https://github.com/corteva/rioxarray/issues/298 Reproducible example in the issue ^^ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Losing data when add a raster to a dataset 841012076 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1