issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 819897789 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Date missing in datetime accessor · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 791089119 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4983#issuecomment-791089119 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5MTA4OTExOQ== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2021-03-05T02:01:23Z | 2021-03-05T02:01:23Z | MEMBER | For sure, thanks for getting started on a PR! I like the more informative Regarding |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Date missing in datetime accessor 819897789 | |
| 790718449 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4983#issuecomment-790718449 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc5MDcxODQ0OQ== | observingClouds 43613877 | 2021-03-04T15:52:38Z | 2021-03-04T15:53:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I didn't thought of using The attrs = {"units": "hours since 3000-01-01"} ds = xr.Dataset({"time": ("time", [0, 1, 2, 3], attrs)}) xr.decode_cf(ds).time.dt.time AttributeError: 'CFTimeIndex' object has no attribute 'time'
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Date missing in datetime accessor 819897789 | |
| 789275247 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4983#issuecomment-789275247 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4OTI3NTI0Nw== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2021-03-02T22:38:50Z | 2021-03-02T22:38:50Z | MEMBER | Yes, I agree, this seems reasonable. It's true that there is no object equivalent to I'll admit I personally have not found a need for functionality like this -- I typically prefer to use something like |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Date missing in datetime accessor 819897789 | |
| 789033264 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4983#issuecomment-789033264 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4983 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4OTAzMzI2NA== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-03-02T16:26:31Z | 2021-03-02T16:26:31Z | MEMBER | Sounds reasonable. Or maybe that's not supported in cftime? cc @spencerkclark |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Date missing in datetime accessor 819897789 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3