issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 813246980 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
784453434 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4941#issuecomment-784453434 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NDQ1MzQzNA== | jenshnielsen 548266 | 2021-02-23T19:28:19Z | 2021-02-23T19:28:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks @max-sixty @mathause |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found 813246980 | |
784449036 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4941#issuecomment-784449036 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NDQ0OTAzNg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-02-23T19:20:51Z | 2021-02-23T19:20:51Z | MEMBER | Great, merging. Thanks @jenshnielsen ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found 813246980 | |
784446439 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4941#issuecomment-784446439 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NDQ0NjQzOQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-23T19:16:44Z | 2021-02-23T19:16:44Z | MEMBER | Thanks. Looks good. IMHO typing is a nice-to-have far-from-complete part of xarray & I wouldn't bother about backwards compatibility (of the typing). Up to you. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found 813246980 | |
783987344 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4941#issuecomment-783987344 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4Mzk4NzM0NA== | jenshnielsen 548266 | 2021-02-23T07:59:46Z | 2021-02-23T09:29:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty Thanks :)
Yes the existing code which is now the fallback could be considered wrong as it does not match the definitions that numpy ships. We could consider syncing that with numpy but that seems like more trouble than its worth since no one is likely to typecheck this against the definitions of numpy functions without running numpy 1.20 or newer. The numpy definition is:
So one could add None and type but should probably omit the rest in order to not replicate too much of numpys internal type definitions |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found 813246980 | |
783177227 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4941#issuecomment-783177227 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4941 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MzE3NzIyNw== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2021-02-22T08:06:42Z | 2021-02-22T08:09:20Z | NONE | Hello @jenshnielsen! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: Comment last updated at 2021-02-22 08:09:19 UTC |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use definition of DTypeLike from Numpy if found 813246980 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4