issue_comments
14 rows where issue = 806436724 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- release 0.17.0 · 14 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
786871459 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-786871459 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4Njg3MTQ1OQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-02-26T20:16:11Z | 2021-02-26T20:16:11Z | MEMBER | Thanks @max-sixty ! |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
782931137 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-782931137 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjkzMTEzNw== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-21T21:37:20Z | 2021-02-21T21:37:20Z | MEMBER | Yes that's the one - thanks! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
782929644 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-782929644 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjkyOTY0NA== | keewis 14808389 | 2021-02-21T21:26:35Z | 2021-02-21T21:26:35Z | MEMBER |
if you're talking about the versions table: this should be fixed in #4907 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
782327590 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-782327590 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MjMyNzU5MA== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-19T20:34:16Z | 2021-02-19T20:34:16Z | MEMBER | There is a small mis-formatting in "whats-new", that would be good to fix: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/latest/whats-new.html |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
780953464 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-780953464 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDk1MzQ2NA== | slevang 39069044 | 2021-02-18T00:51:04Z | 2021-02-18T00:51:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | 4849 should be almost ready to go. Would be good for someone else to confirm the API makes sense. Additional features and performance enhancements could be added in later releases as long as the API is acceptable. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
780735665 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-780735665 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDczNTY2NQ== | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2021-02-17T17:53:29Z | 2021-02-17T17:53:29Z | MEMBER |
No worries, @alexamici, as the API can be switched to v2 already, this is no major problem. Better safe than sorry wrt testing. Thank you and your colleagues! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
780731411 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-780731411 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDczMTQxMQ== | alexamici 226037 | 2021-02-17T17:46:46Z | 2021-02-17T17:46:46Z | MEMBER | I don't think we will be ready by this week-end and we don't want to rush the switch to the new API without some thorough testing by others. We will wait for the next release. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
780699009 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-780699009 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDY5OTAwOQ== | kmuehlbauer 5821660 | 2021-02-17T16:57:37Z | 2021-02-17T16:57:57Z | MEMBER |
This would be really great. But if it doesn't fit now, I hope a release will be cut right after finalising backend refactor. This is an eagerly awaited addition. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
780692008 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-780692008 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDY5MjAwOA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-02-17T16:47:28Z | 2021-02-17T16:47:28Z | MEMBER | @max-sixty will cut a release this weekend. @alexamici can you get the PR in by then? If not, we can release again! and again! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
778774317 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-778774317 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODc3NDMxNw== | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-02-14T12:57:27Z | 2021-02-14T13:04:23Z | MEMBER | May I suggest #4740 as well. I think it's ready and it helps me quite a bit in my 2k+ data variable use cases. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
778447800 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-778447800 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODQ0NzgwMA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2021-02-12T20:50:52Z | 2021-02-12T20:50:52Z | MEMBER | Unless we're really confident that a feature is a few days away, I'd vote to generally proceed with releases. Releases are fairly cheap to do now (and I'm happy to do them), and uncoupling parts of the process lets it move faster. Ofc if we have regressions, then we should solve those. (I have been under a crunch recently but can hopefully help more in a week or so) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
778230463 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-778230463 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODIzMDQ2Mw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-02-12T14:33:01Z | 2021-02-12T14:33:17Z | MEMBER | @alexamici no target date AFAIK. it'd be nice to release soon since there are incompatibilities with a few new library versions |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | |
778060647 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-778060647 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODA2MDY0Nw== | alexamici 226037 | 2021-02-12T08:44:55Z | 2021-02-12T08:45:23Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 | ||
777503859 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4894#issuecomment-777503859 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4894 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NzUwMzg1OQ== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2021-02-11T14:34:11Z | 2021-02-11T14:34:11Z | MEMBER | Thanks @dcherian! I agree those would be good to get in too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
release 0.17.0 806436724 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 9