issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 803068773 and user = 488992 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
775489828 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-775489828 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4879 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NTQ4OTgyOA== | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-02-08T21:56:21Z | 2021-02-08T21:56:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As my colleague @huard suggested, I have written an additional test which demonstrates the problem (essentially the same idea I proposed in my initial issue): https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:add-netcdf-refresh-test As I explained in the issue I have a potential fix for the problem: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:netcdf-caching-bug but the problem is that it feels a bit weird to have to that, so I suspect that there's a better way to solve it. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately 803068773 | |
774781361 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-774781361 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4879 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NDc4MTM2MQ== | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-02-07T22:40:44Z | 2021-02-07T22:42:11Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you for the feedback! I quickly tested your suggested fix against the script I refered to in my original issue, and it's still behaving the same if I'm not mistaken. I looked very quickly so perhaps I'm wrong, but what I seem to understand is that your fix is similar to an idea my colleague @huard had, which was to make the cached item more granular by adding a call to Sorry in advance if something in my analysis is wrong, which is very likely! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately 803068773 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1