issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 803068773 and user = 488992 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 775489828 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-775489828 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4879 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NTQ4OTgyOA== | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-02-08T21:56:21Z | 2021-02-08T21:56:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | As my colleague @huard suggested, I have written an additional test which demonstrates the problem (essentially the same idea I proposed in my initial issue): https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:add-netcdf-refresh-test As I explained in the issue I have a potential fix for the problem: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/compare/master...cjauvin:netcdf-caching-bug but the problem is that it feels a bit weird to have to that, so I suspect that there's a better way to solve it. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately 803068773 | |
| 774781361 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4879#issuecomment-774781361 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4879 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3NDc4MTM2MQ== | cjauvin 488992 | 2021-02-07T22:40:44Z | 2021-02-07T22:42:11Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you for the feedback! I quickly tested your suggested fix against the script I refered to in my original issue, and it's still behaving the same if I'm not mistaken. I looked very quickly so perhaps I'm wrong, but what I seem to understand is that your fix is similar to an idea my colleague @huard had, which was to make the cached item more granular by adding a call to Sorry in advance if something in my analysis is wrong, which is very likely! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Cache files for different CachingFileManager objects separately 803068773 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1