issue_comments

Table actions

6 rows where issue = 760375642 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 3

author_association 2

issue 1

  • Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted · 6 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
746816761 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-746816761 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NjgxNjc2MQ== jbusecke 14314623 2020-12-16T18:49:54Z 2020-12-16T18:49:54Z CONTRIBUTOR

Thanks for all the help! I made the entry to whats-new.rst.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642
744580291 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-744580291 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDU4MDI5MQ== keewis 14808389 2020-12-14T17:08:47Z 2020-12-14T17:08:47Z MEMBER

I think #4625 is a bug, so "bug fixes" would probably be better

 
{
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642
744575606 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-744575606 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDU3NTYwNg== mathause 10194086 2020-12-14T17:01:13Z 2020-12-14T17:01:13Z MEMBER

Up to you. Maybe under internal changes.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642
744572308 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-744572308 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDU3MjMwOA== jbusecke 14314623 2020-12-14T16:56:19Z 2020-12-14T16:56:19Z CONTRIBUTOR

do you wan't to add a what's new entry? In any case we can merge this in a few days unless someone else has a comment.

Not sure. Would you think that this is significant enough? If yes, Id be happy to do it.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642
744534426 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-744534426 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDUzNDQyNg== mathause 10194086 2020-12-14T15:56:47Z 2020-12-14T15:56:47Z MEMBER

:+1: do you wan't to add a what's new entry? In any case we can merge this in a few days unless someone else has a comment.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642
744504269 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4668#issuecomment-744504269 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4668 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc0NDUwNDI2OQ== jbusecke 14314623 2020-12-14T15:09:55Z 2020-12-14T15:09:55Z CONTRIBUTOR

Oops. Thanks for catching that. Should be fixed now.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Fixing non-lazy behavior of sampled+weighted 760375642

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);