issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 754789691 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Support for monotonically decreasing indices in interpolate_na · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1492399834 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4637#issuecomment-1492399834 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4637 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y9Dba | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2023-03-31T18:10:24Z | 2023-03-31T18:10:24Z | MEMBER | @alrho007 the code for this method on which calls the implementation defined in I would start by trying to understand that code (looking at where things are imported to make it work), and then create a small test case example with a monotonically decreasing index that causes a problem. Then try to work out exactly which step in the code causes the issue, and whether it can be generalized to fix the issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for monotonically decreasing indices in interpolate_na 754789691 | |
1491793033 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4637#issuecomment-1491793033 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4637 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y6vSJ | husainridwan 61923007 | 2023-03-31T11:36:46Z | 2023-03-31T11:37:12Z | NONE | @TomNicholas @dcherian where would I start from if I want to work on this? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for monotonically decreasing indices in interpolate_na 754789691 | |
789652922 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4637#issuecomment-789652922 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4637 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4OTY1MjkyMg== | cvoivret 7123715 | 2021-03-03T11:39:38Z | 2021-03-03T11:39:38Z | NONE | A simple trick could be to not use the coordinate while interpolating. An example with the same data but the second dataset has a decreasing index. ```python import numpy as np import xarray as xr da = xr.DataArray([0, 2, np.nan, 3, 3.25], dims="x", coords={"x": [0, 1, 2, 3, 4]}) da1= xr.DataArray([3.25, 3,np.nan,2,0],dims='x',coords={"x":[4,3,2,1,0]}) da_inter=da.interpolate_na(dim='x', method='cubic') da1_inter=da1.interpolate_na(dim='x',method='cubic',use_coordinate=False) ``` As far as I understand interpolation, the result is the same. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support for monotonically decreasing indices in interpolate_na 754789691 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3