issue_comments
12 rows where issue = 745801652 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) · 12 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 871611079 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-871611079 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MTYxMTA3OQ== | amatsukawa 463809 | 2021-06-30T17:53:54Z | 2021-06-30T17:53:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am trying to use |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 870777725 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-870777725 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MDc3NzcyNQ== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-06-29T17:20:43Z | 2021-06-29T17:20:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I only have vague thoughts. To be sure: you can pickle the file-system, any mapper ( The question here is, why msgpack is being invoked. Those items, as well as any internal xarray stuff should only be in tasks, and so pickled. Is there a high-level-graph layer encapsulating things that were previously pickled? The only things that appear in any HLG-layer should be the paths and storage options needed to open a file-system, not the file-system itself. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 870152019 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-870152019 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MDE1MjAxOQ== | amatsukawa 463809 | 2021-06-29T01:10:30Z | 2021-06-29T01:14:58Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This issue appears to be back in some form, with The code looks like this, using fsspec's mapper API to access Azure blob store:
I have not tracked down a self-contained reproducer, as it only fails for one call but not others of a similar form. Reporting it while I dig into it further, in case you have any suggestions.
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 730467523 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-730467523 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMDQ2NzUyMw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2020-11-19T15:54:38Z | 2020-11-19T15:54:38Z | MEMBER | This is fixed by intake/filesystem_spec#477. However, the existence of this issue points to the need for more ecosystem-wide integration testing of xarray / dask / zarr / fsspec. I know we discussed this is on some other issue, but I can't find it... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 730031761 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-730031761 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczMDAzMTc2MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-11-18T23:56:17Z | 2020-11-18T23:56:17Z | MEMBER | OK, I think I understand what's going on. Xarray serializes arguments that should suffice to recreate/open a backend-specific file object (e.g., |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729863863 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729863863 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTg2Mzg2Mw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2020-11-18T18:15:16Z | 2020-11-18T18:15:16Z | MEMBER | Thanks for your quick response to this Martin! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729863434 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729863434 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTg2MzQzNA== | martindurant 6042212 | 2020-11-18T18:14:28Z | 2020-11-18T18:14:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The |
{
"total_count": 2,
"+1": 2,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729837649 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729837649 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTgzNzY0OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-11-18T17:37:58Z | 2020-11-18T17:37:58Z | MEMBER |
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729803257 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729803257 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTgwMzI1Nw== | martindurant 6042212 | 2020-11-18T16:42:30Z | 2020-11-18T16:42:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | OK, I can see a thing after all... please stand by |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729796223 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729796223 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTc5NjIyMw== | rabernat 1197350 | 2020-11-18T16:31:14Z | 2020-11-18T16:31:14Z | MEMBER | Can you figure out how the http version differs from the gcs version? That might hold a clue. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729795030 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729795030 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTc5NTAzMA== | martindurant 6042212 | 2020-11-18T16:29:18Z | 2020-11-18T16:29:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I don't think it's fsspec, the HTTPFileSystem and file objects are known to serialise. However ```
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 | |
| 729793908 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4591#issuecomment-729793908 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4591 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcyOTc5MzkwOA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2020-11-18T16:27:30Z | 2020-11-18T16:27:30Z | MEMBER | I finally found a permutation that works, which makes me think this is an fsspec error. ```python import gcsfs gcs = gcsfs.GCSFileSystem()
url = 'gs://ldeo-glaciology/bedmachine/BedMachineAntarctica_2019-11-05_v01.nc' |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Serialization issue with distributed, h5netcdf, and fsspec (ImplicitToExplicitIndexingAdapter) 745801652 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4