issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 715730538 and user = 10194086 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- deprecate pynio backend · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1086647600 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-1086647600 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85AxO0w | mathause 10194086 | 2022-04-02T14:02:50Z | 2022-04-02T14:02:50Z | MEMBER | We can uncomment here: which adds it back to the test suite. As the version does not change, the new build should also be picked up from (it's nice to see that the build for pynio is fixed, but the package itself does not seem to be actively maintained). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 | |
786655192 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-786655192 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjY1NTE5Mg== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-26T13:42:33Z | 2021-02-26T13:42:33Z | MEMBER | That would be nice. I would probably call it "xarray-pynio" (?) and move it to the "xarray-contrib" organisation. However, I think this needs a higher-level decision. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 | |
786492109 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-786492109 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NjQ5MjEwOQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-26T08:27:50Z | 2021-02-26T08:27:50Z | MEMBER | We just bumped the the minimum version of python-netCDF4 to 1.5 - we won't be able to bump it to 1.6 because of this. So we'll need to decide what to do with pynio before and properly deprecate it. Worth noting though, that there is no python-netCDF4 version 1.6 at the moment, so this is not all that urgent. netCDF4 has not released a minor version in a long time (March 2019) (but they have done 12 patch releases). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 | |
706737872 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-706737872 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNjczNzg3Mg== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-10-11T17:22:19Z | 2020-10-11T17:22:19Z | MEMBER | 4492 is merged. I changed the title to reflect that pynio should eventually be moved to an external repo but keep the issue open to have the discussion in place. I hope that this should not be too hard after the backend refactor. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 | |
705143832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-705143832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNTE0MzgzMg== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-10-07T19:22:46Z | 2020-10-07T19:22:46Z | MEMBER |
Yes, fine for me - check #4492 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 | |
704907241 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4491#issuecomment-704907241 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4491 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDcwNDkwNzI0MQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-10-07T12:39:38Z | 2020-10-07T12:39:38Z | MEMBER | In Keep pynio in
- Remove pynio from:
- Do you agree? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
deprecate pynio backend 715730538 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1