issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 659232211 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • shoyer · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • per-variable fill values · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
676632785 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4237#issuecomment-676632785 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4237 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NjYzMjc4NQ== shoyer 1217238 2020-08-19T20:02:23Z 2020-08-19T20:02:23Z MEMBER

To fix that, I would manually apply duck_array_ops.fillna to data variables and coordinates and then reassemble the dataset (using _to_temp_dataset / _from_temp_dataset for DataArray), but since I don't really understand apply_ufunc, I'm not sure what that would break.

I think this would be a fine way to it, though it does feel rather complicated. Per variable fill-values doesn't quite fit the model of apply_ufunc when applied to entire Dataset/DataArray objects.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   per-variable fill values 659232211

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);