issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 636611699 and user = 1386642 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Improve typehints of xr.Dataset.__getitem__ · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
644231473 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4144#issuecomment-644231473 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0NDIzMTQ3Mw== | nbren12 1386642 | 2020-06-15T16:15:58Z | 2020-06-15T16:32:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @crusaderky Thanks for the re-work. For my own benefit, could you explain why that code worked? I remember writing something very similar, and running into mypy errors. My understanding of how mypy intreprets overload seems incomplete. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve typehints of xr.Dataset.__getitem__ 636611699 | |
643506298 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4144#issuecomment-643506298 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MzUwNjI5OA== | nbren12 1386642 | 2020-06-12T22:23:56Z | 2020-06-12T22:23:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | No problem! I think I am done with this one unless you think its important that I document or test this somehow. Can someone review it? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve typehints of xr.Dataset.__getitem__ 636611699 | |
643079280 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4144#issuecomment-643079280 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MzA3OTI4MA== | nbren12 1386642 | 2020-06-12T05:49:56Z | 2020-06-12T05:49:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Okay. Assuming the tests pass, I think this is ready for review. I tried adding a test, but mypy didn't seem to find problems even with code that I know doesn't work (e.g. In any case, this code does work: ``` $ cat test_mypy.py (fv3net) import xarray as xr ds = xr.Dataset({"a": ()}) arr = ds['a'] union_obj = ds[['a']] reveal_locals() $ mypy test_mypy.py (fv3net) test_mypy.py:8: note: Revealed local types are: test_mypy.py:8: note: arr: xarray.core.dataarray.DataArray test_mypy.py:8: note: ds: xarray.core.dataset.Dataset test_mypy.py:8: note: union_obj: Union[xarray.core.dataarray.DataArray, xarray.core.dataset.Dataset] ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve typehints of xr.Dataset.__getitem__ 636611699 | |
643014353 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4144#issuecomment-643014353 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4144 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MzAxNDM1Mw== | nbren12 1386642 | 2020-06-12T01:27:55Z | 2020-06-12T01:33:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @mathause On further consideration, I think it might not be possible to get this to work. This method has three behaviors: - Mapping -> Dataset - Hashable -> DataArray - else (List): -> Dataset With my limited understanding of Would a good middle ground be something like this? - Hashable -> DataArray - Any -> Union[DataArray, Dataset] I think this would work since both the input/outputs of the first one are subtypes of the second one. It's not a complete solution, but it would solve the most common problem of |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve typehints of xr.Dataset.__getitem__ 636611699 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1