issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 636493109 and user = 291576 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • WeatherGod · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Should we make "rasterio" an engine option? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
642253287 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4142#issuecomment-642253287 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4142 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0MjI1MzI4Nw== WeatherGod 291576 2020-06-10T20:55:32Z 2020-06-10T20:55:32Z CONTRIBUTOR

So, one important difference I see off the bat is that zarr already had a DataStore implementation, while rasterio does not. I take it that implementing one would be the preferred approach?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Should we make "rasterio" an engine option? 636493109

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);