issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 621968474 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- lazy evaluation of large arrays fails · 4 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 631670146 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4085#issuecomment-631670146 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4085 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMTY3MDE0Ng== | hetland 2599958 | 2020-05-20T19:11:56Z | 2020-05-20T19:11:56Z | NONE | The problem was only with very large arrays, so difficult to reproduce here. Fortunately, when I just now updated to the very latest xarray/dask, the problem seems to have gone away. I was puzzled because things worked fine -- as expected -- but only for smaller arrays. I will close this issue. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
lazy evaluation of large arrays fails 621968474 | |
| 631658737 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4085#issuecomment-631658737 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4085 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMTY1ODczNw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-05-20T18:50:50Z | 2020-05-20T18:50:50Z | MEMBER | Something is very wrong here. is this reproducible? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
lazy evaluation of large arrays fails 621968474 | |
| 631636660 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4085#issuecomment-631636660 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4085 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMTYzNjY2MA== | JavierRuano 34353851 | 2020-05-20T18:07:22Z | 2020-05-20T18:07:22Z | NONE | I use http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.apply_ufunc.html because it is faster. El mié., 20 may. 2020 a las 20:01, Javier Ruano (javier.ruanno@gmail.com) escribió:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
lazy evaluation of large arrays fails 621968474 | |
| 631633988 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4085#issuecomment-631633988 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4085 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMTYzMzk4OA== | JavierRuano 34353851 | 2020-05-20T18:01:42Z | 2020-05-20T18:01:42Z | NONE | if you append compute() it should not be a lazy operation. But my advice is like user only. El mié., 20 may. 2020 a las 19:51, Rob Hetland (notifications@github.com) escribió:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
lazy evaluation of large arrays fails 621968474 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3