issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 612785915 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- 0.16.0 release · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
658323614 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-658323614 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1ODMyMzYxNA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-07-14T17:54:31Z | 2020-07-14T17:54:31Z | MEMBER | Thanks @max-sixty ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
655037306 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-655037306 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1NTAzNzMwNg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-07-07T18:15:38Z | 2020-07-07T18:15:38Z | MEMBER | FYI I will do this towards the end of this week or at the latest this weekend |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
653272781 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-653272781 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MzI3Mjc4MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-07-03T00:33:59Z | 2020-07-03T00:33:59Z | MEMBER |
Exactly, so this will push to 0.17 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
653221505 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-653221505 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MzIyMTUwNQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-07-02T21:09:35Z | 2020-07-02T21:09:45Z | MEMBER |
:+1: I'm also not sure what the bug is. In fact it's possible that a bug was fixed and a workaround is what's raising the error now :P Re: #3891 do you mean set |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
653218817 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-653218817 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MzIxODgxNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-07-02T21:02:06Z | 2020-07-02T21:02:06Z | MEMBER | Thanks for updating @dcherian . Is it worth waiting for #3985? I'm still not sure exactly what the bug is there. I'd vote to leave it until we have a repro. I was thinking of sneaking in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3891 but didn't want to bring it up as probably won't be able to; definitely not worth waiting on me for! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
651874554 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-651874554 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTg3NDU1NA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-06-30T15:38:38Z | 2020-06-30T15:38:38Z | MEMBER | Agree! I'll keep an eye on those this week. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
651387910 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-651387910 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1MTM4NzkxMA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-06-29T21:50:06Z | 2020-06-29T21:50:06Z | MEMBER | Yes we have some breaking changes so definitely 0.16.0 IMO we should do #4184 #4175 and #4163 and then release. #3985 is still waiting for a minimal example so perhaps we should leave that for the next release. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
649798109 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-649798109 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0OTc5ODEwOQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-06-25T20:22:51Z | 2020-06-25T20:22:51Z | MEMBER | As discussed on the dev call, I'll take this one. I think we need to do 0.16.0 as we had some backward-incompat changes (I can't remember now what they were; but can hunt them down if anyone otherwise has a preference for 0.15.2?) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 | |
630369063 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4031#issuecomment-630369063 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4031 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDM2OTA2Mw== | mathause 10194086 | 2020-05-18T18:45:05Z | 2020-06-15T08:01:05Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
0.16.0 release 612785915 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3