issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 594688816 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • fujiisoup · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Why don't we allow indexing with keyword args via __call__? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
609558708 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3939#issuecomment-609558708 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3939 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwOTU1ODcwOA== fujiisoup 6815844 2020-04-06T04:29:19Z 2020-04-06T04:29:19Z MEMBER

Agreed with @max-sixty. I also like sel and isel as they are clearly distinguishable. It is not clear to me if parenthesis corresponds to sel or isel.

For me, the largest drawback of sel and isel is the fact that autocompleters can not suggest the dimension names (it is another issue though)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Why don't we allow indexing with keyword args via __call__? 594688816

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);