home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

1 row where issue = 579722569 and user = 2444231 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • pgierz · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Backend env · 1 ✖

author_association 1

  • NONE 1
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
598569859 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3858#issuecomment-598569859 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5ODU2OTg1OQ== pgierz 2444231 2020-03-13T06:21:35Z 2020-03-13T06:25:43Z NONE

Yes, I agree. Having a library only depend on the environment is less than optimal to say the least. The main reason behind this was to allow one of the GRB backends to read custom tables. I've already contacted both the cfgrib and PyNIO people to see about changing this to something more flexible.

Regarding writing my own utility: I'm afraid this introduces one more hoop for end users to jump through. If I can tell my colleagues "Hey just use Xarray", that normally works pretty well. If I now need to say "Hey, use my own little thing plus Xarray plus ...." (who knows what else) might introduce more friction.

However, it's an interesting idea: How challenging would it be to write my own Xarray backend (In this case for GRB files) and include that instead? Would Xarray be open to including a further backend? That would separate the logic into it's own project and if anything breaks, then the Xarray team would have less to worry about and can just refer issues to the backend development team (so, I guess me 😉)...

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Backend env 579722569

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.056ms · About: xarray-datasette