home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

2 rows where issue = 576337745 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • max-sixty · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • Errors using to_zarr for an s3 store · 2 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER 2
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
595403356 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3831#issuecomment-595403356 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3831 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5NTQwMzM1Ng== max-sixty 5635139 2020-03-05T19:25:40Z 2020-03-05T19:25:40Z MEMBER

Not to hijack this specific issue for the general case, but any thoughts on the best way for users & us to identify the appropriate library for users to direct their issues? Is it just the last item in the call stack? Does xarray need to build diagnostics / assertions for highlighting where the problem is?

A quick survey of the first two pages of xarray issues yield a bunch of issues which receive no response from us, and those that do are often a decent amount of back & forth: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3815 (zarr?) https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3781 (scipy? dask?) https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3776 (probably xarray, maybe netcdf) https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3767 (scipy? netcdf? this did get a response, from @dcherian ) https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3754 (pydap. @dcherian worked through this one with some back and forth)

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Errors using to_zarr for an s3 store 576337745
595293828 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3831#issuecomment-595293828 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3831 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5NTI5MzgyOA== max-sixty 5635139 2020-03-05T15:37:18Z 2020-03-05T15:37:18Z MEMBER

Thanks for the issue @LewisJarrod

@jhamman (or @rabernat ?) -- what's the best way of identifying whether this is an xarray or zarr issue? There's a few similar issues in the backlog, and they often go unanswered. To the extent we can help people split out where the issue is and push it to the relevant library, that would keep things moving. Thank you

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Errors using to_zarr for an s3 store 576337745

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 153.723ms · About: xarray-datasette