issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 573031381 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Xarray operations produce read-only array · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
592799268 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-592799268 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjc5OTI2OA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2020-02-29T01:06:05Z | 2023-03-22T15:11:09Z | MEMBER | It's usually We should add an FAQ for little things like this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
809858535 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-809858535 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgwOTg1ODUzNQ== | rbavery 22258697 | 2021-03-30T02:31:54Z | 2021-03-30T02:31:54Z | NONE | I ran into the same issue as @bradyrx with writable arrays and apply_ufunc. An addition to the docs FAQ or apply_ufunc docs would help clarify that you can't write to the array inputs in the ufunc. I also want to +1 @bradyrx 's idea of making an arg to apply_ufunc that copies the input arrays to handle this common use case. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
655142333 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-655142333 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1NTE0MjMzMw== | bradyrx 8881170 | 2020-07-07T21:22:30Z | 2020-07-07T21:22:30Z | CONTRIBUTOR | FYI, this is also seen on Example:
A = xr.DataArray(np.random.rand(10, 5), dims=['time', 'space']) B = xr.DataArray(np.random.rand(10, 5), dims=['time', 'space']) A[0, 1] = np.nan B[5, 0] = np.nan xr.apply_ufunc(match_nans, A, B, input_core_dims=[['time'], ['time']], output_core_dims=[['time'], ['time']], # Try with and without vectorize. vectorize=True,) ``` |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
592874409 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-592874409 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjg3NDQwOQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-02-29T04:56:45Z | 2020-02-29T04:56:45Z | MEMBER | Cheers @djhoese Yes, let's leave this open. Two follow-ups from https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2891#issuecomment-482880911; we would welcome PRs:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
592847155 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-592847155 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjg0NzE1NQ== | djhoese 1828519 | 2020-02-29T03:38:46Z | 2020-02-29T03:38:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty That's exactly it. What's really weird for this is that the original code in Satpy is using a dask array and not a numpy array. It seemed very strange to both copy the DataArray ( I can understand how xarray would treat numpy arrays and dask arrays the same when it comes to this, but coming from outside the project it is very surprising that a dask array would be marked as read-only when it was used to just create a "new" numpy array. Feel free to close this or use it as a marker to clarify some documentation or error messages as mentioned in #2891. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | |
592805831 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-592805831 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MjgwNTgzMQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-02-29T01:35:54Z | 2020-02-29T01:35:54Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 | ||
592760687 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3813#issuecomment-592760687 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3813 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5Mjc2MDY4Nw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-02-28T22:35:18Z | 2020-02-28T22:35:18Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the report @djhoese . Confirmed in 0.15.0 too. Do you know which of those steps causes the array to become non-writeable? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray operations produce read-only array 573031381 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5