issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 532878771 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 564555360 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-564555360 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NDU1NTM2MA== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-12-11T14:02:06Z | 2019-12-13T10:59:28Z | MEMBER | When I wrote the ( |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 | |
| 562654276 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-562654276 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MjY1NDI3Ng== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-12-06T17:00:23Z | 2019-12-06T17:00:23Z | MEMBER | (forgive me, am on vacation) I actually didn't know about the multiple levels of While it is a behavior change, I think it's fine: the current behavior is somewhere between a bug and an undocumented artefact. Unless others see a more material change here? |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 | |
| 561819897 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-561819897 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MTgxOTg5Nw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-12-04T20:13:57Z | 2019-12-04T20:13:57Z | MEMBER | I think that it's sensible that This is a behaviour change though. I'm not sure how to deal with that. cc @max-sixty |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 | |
| 561812950 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-561812950 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MTgxMjk1MA== | mathause 10194086 | 2019-12-04T19:54:57Z | 2019-12-04T19:54:57Z | MEMBER | Sorry, read before you edited - I can try to add a PR if you agree to change this behavior. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 | |
| 561812227 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-561812227 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MTgxMjIyNw== | mathause 10194086 | 2019-12-04T19:53:06Z | 2019-12-04T19:53:06Z | MEMBER | Yes, it works for the Dataset-level attrs and the docstring also specifies that:
So the question is more if this is the expected behaviour? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 | |
| 561810709 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3595#issuecomment-561810709 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3595 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MTgxMDcwOQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-12-04T19:49:00Z | 2019-12-04T19:52:10Z | MEMBER | Looking at the code, This may be fixable by threading keep_attrs down through |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
xr.Dataset.map drops attrs of DataArray 532878771 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4