issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 490618213 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xr.DataSet.from_dataframe / xr.DataArray.from_series does not preserve DateTimeIndex with timezone · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
824354016 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3291#issuecomment-824354016 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNDM1NDAxNg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2021-04-21T20:59:18Z | 2021-04-21T21:00:41Z | MEMBER |
No, unfortunate it is not possible to use a The bigger issue is that elsewhere in Xarray probably needs updates to avoid assuming that all dtype objects are |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.DataSet.from_dataframe / xr.DataArray.from_series does not preserve DateTimeIndex with timezone 490618213 | |
824146151 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3291#issuecomment-824146151 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyNDE0NjE1MQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-04-21T15:18:57Z | 2021-04-21T15:18:57Z | MEMBER | I am confused on the following point after reading the indexing refactor design notes on removing IndexVariable. If |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.DataSet.from_dataframe / xr.DataArray.from_series does not preserve DateTimeIndex with timezone 490618213 | |
823833533 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3291#issuecomment-823833533 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgyMzgzMzUzMw== | scottyhq 3924836 | 2021-04-21T07:12:11Z | 2021-04-21T07:13:45Z | MEMBER | Just wanted to rekindle discussion here and ping @dcherian and @benbovy , the current workaround for pandas DatetimeIndex with timezone info (dtype='datetime64[ns, EST]') is to drop the timezone piece or use If I'm following https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/design_notes/flexible_indexes_notes.md this is another potential example of improved user-friendliness where we could have timezone-aware indexes and therefore call pandas methods like This would definitely be great for remote sensing data that is usually stored with UTC timestamps, but often analysis requires converting to local time. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.DataSet.from_dataframe / xr.DataArray.from_series does not preserve DateTimeIndex with timezone 490618213 | |
531522690 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3291#issuecomment-531522690 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3291 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMTUyMjY5MA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-09-15T00:00:37Z | 2019-09-15T00:00:37Z | MEMBER | You should be getting a warning about this if you use the latest version of pandas. In the future, this behavior will change to return an object dtype array full of pandas Datetime objects. Unfortunately NumPy doesn't have a built-in datetime with time-zone stype, so this is about the best we can do. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.DataSet.from_dataframe / xr.DataArray.from_series does not preserve DateTimeIndex with timezone 490618213 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3