issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 490593787 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Using min() with skipna=True · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
529164506 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529164506 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE2NDUwNg== | zxdawn 30388627 | 2019-09-08T02:52:56Z | 2019-09-08T02:52:56Z | NONE | @shoyer Thanks. It's not datetime64 arrays, this is the result of I use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529164037 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529164037 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE2NDAzNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-09-08T02:41:58Z | 2019-09-08T02:41:58Z | MEMBER | For datetime64 arrays, use np.isnat() instead of isnan. On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 7:39 PM Xin Zhang notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529163827 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529163827 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE2MzgyNw== | zxdawn 30388627 | 2019-09-08T02:39:30Z | 2019-09-08T02:39:30Z | NONE | @keewis I tried to using |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529163295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529163295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE2MzI5NQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2019-09-08T02:27:23Z | 2019-09-08T02:27:23Z | MEMBER | do you actually have any non-nan values in your array? From what I understand of how nanops work is that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529163060 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529163060 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE2MzA2MA== | zxdawn 30388627 | 2019-09-08T02:22:01Z | 2019-09-08T02:22:01Z | NONE | @shoyer Thank. It works now. But, I get another question.
This is the result of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529152703 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529152703 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE1MjcwMw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-09-07T22:43:48Z | 2019-09-07T22:44:18Z | MEMBER | I think this may have been fixed by https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2924 (which removed the line with Can you try upgrading to xarray 0.12.3? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529091168 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529091168 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTA5MTE2OA== | zxdawn 30388627 | 2019-09-07T09:33:32Z | 2019-09-07T09:33:32Z | NONE | @max-sixty Actually, I'm using numpy = 1.13.1 and I need skipna= True. Don't understand the error it shows. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 | |
529083217 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3290#issuecomment-529083217 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3290 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTA4MzIxNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-09-07T07:40:32Z | 2019-09-07T07:40:32Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the issue @zxdawn . Did you try doing this?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Using min() with skipna=True 490593787 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4