issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 481761508 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature request for multiple tolerance values when using nearest method and sel() · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 890129356 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3223#issuecomment-890129356 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3223 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841DkvM | benbovy 4160723 | 2021-07-30T20:12:36Z | 2021-07-30T20:12:36Z | MEMBER | This is still relevant. As part of the ongoing explicit / flexible indexes refactoring, we'll probably need a more general solution to pass any selection option to the corresponding indexes. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request for multiple tolerance values when using nearest method and sel() 481761508 | |
| 883977616 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3223#issuecomment-883977616 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3223 | IC_kwDOAMm_X840sG2Q | stale[bot] 26384082 | 2021-07-21T08:00:50Z | 2021-07-21T08:00:50Z | NONE | In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity If this issue remains relevant, please comment here or remove the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request for multiple tolerance values when using nearest method and sel() 481761508 | |
| 522137031 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3223#issuecomment-522137031 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3223 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMjEzNzAzMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-08-16T20:13:07Z | 2019-08-16T20:13:07Z | MEMBER | We could potentially do this, and your suggested API looks sane. But before we start, are you sure we need it? Would it suffice to index multiple times instead? I guess a motivating use-case could be point-wise indexing in a multi-dimensional dataset, e.g., to pull out lat/lon/time values matching a list of points. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request for multiple tolerance values when using nearest method and sel() 481761508 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3