issue_comments

Table actions

5 rows where issue = 476494705 and user = 868027 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • DocOtak · 5 ✖

issue 1

  • RTD build failing · 5 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
518677703 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518677703 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODY3NzcwMw== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-06T13:49:47Z 2019-08-06T13:49:47Z CONTRIBUTOR

Seems the docs are still failing to build, except this time it is being killed due to too much resource consumption.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   RTD build failing 476494705
518426134 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518426134 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODQyNjEzNA== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-05T22:32:12Z 2019-08-05T22:32:12Z CONTRIBUTOR

@max-sixty I made a PR which bumps rasterio.

Something else to consider is enabling channel_priority strict in the conda environment. When I had enabled that in local testing, the conda solver was unable to create the requested environment. It seemed the requested rasterio version was no longer on conda-forge (though maybe under the cf201901 label?). Though if I recall, there was also a mismatch between the requested pandas and python versions when strict was enabled.

It seems the trade off is where you want the failure to occur, either in making the environment in conda, or when some package stops working.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   RTD build failing 476494705
518381266 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518381266 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODM4MTI2Ng== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-05T20:12:37Z 2019-08-05T20:12:37Z CONTRIBUTOR

So it looks more like a conda channel mixing problem to me now. Perhaps just bumping rasterio to 1.0.24?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   RTD build failing 476494705
518368420 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518368420 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODM2ODQyMA== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-05T19:32:10Z 2019-08-05T19:32:10Z CONTRIBUTOR

Has anyone with access tried just wiping the env? https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/guides/wipe-environment.html

Specifically, when I was testing locally my rasterio was not importing, but at some point in the past, had run successfully. I was able to fix by removing the auto_gallery dir from the docs dir.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   RTD build failing 476494705
518062884 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518062884 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODA2Mjg4NA== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-05T02:25:02Z 2019-08-05T02:25:02Z CONTRIBUTOR 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   RTD build failing 476494705

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);