issue_comments

Table actions

2 rows where issue = 467771005 and user = 306380 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • mrocklin · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • Support for __array_function__ implementers (sparse arrays) [WIP] · 2 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
518355147 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3117#issuecomment-518355147 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3117 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODM1NTE0Nw== mrocklin 306380 2019-08-05T18:53:39Z 2019-08-05T18:53:39Z MEMBER

Woot! Thanks @nvictus !

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Support for __array_function__ implementers (sparse arrays) [WIP] 467771005
517311370 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3117#issuecomment-517311370 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3117 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzMxMTM3MA== mrocklin 306380 2019-08-01T14:27:13Z 2019-08-01T14:27:13Z MEMBER

Checking in here. This was a fun project during SciPy Sprints that both showed a lot of potential and generated a lot of excitement. But of course as we all returned home other things came up and this has lingered for a while.

How can we best preserve this work? Two specific questions:

  1. @nvictus can you summarize, from your perspective, what still needs to be done here? If you aren't likely to have time to finish this up (which would not be surprising) where should someone else start if they wanted to push this forward?
  2. Xarray devs, are there parts of this PR that could go in quickly, even without the full implementation, just so that this doesn't grow stale?
 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Support for __array_function__ implementers (sparse arrays) [WIP] 467771005

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);