issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 456971151 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 504078924 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504078924 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA3ODkyNA== | andrew-c-ross 5852283 | 2019-06-20T15:46:59Z | 2019-06-20T15:46:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sounds great. Thanks for making this a smooth and well documented process for new contributors |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
| 504069867 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504069867 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA2OTg2Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-20T15:24:19Z | 2019-06-20T15:24:19Z | MEMBER | OK, I'm going to go ahead and merge after tests pass! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
| 503553184 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503553184 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzU1MzE4NA== | andrew-c-ross 5852283 | 2019-06-19T13:08:41Z | 2019-06-19T13:08:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have to say as someone who is probably an average user, inconsistencies between related projects, like xarray/pandas or matplotlib/seaborn, drive me nuts. But I also agree that |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
| 503241583 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503241583 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzI0MTU4Mw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-06-18T17:49:03Z | 2019-06-18T17:49:03Z | MEMBER |
I'm ambivalent. I prefer the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
| 503189754 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503189754 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzE4OTc1NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-18T15:33:50Z | 2019-06-18T15:33:50Z | MEMBER | This looks great, thank you! One design question: should we stick with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3