issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 456971151 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
504078924 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504078924 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA3ODkyNA== | andrew-c-ross 5852283 | 2019-06-20T15:46:59Z | 2019-06-20T15:46:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sounds great. Thanks for making this a smooth and well documented process for new contributors |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
504069867 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504069867 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA2OTg2Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-20T15:24:19Z | 2019-06-20T15:24:19Z | MEMBER | OK, I'm going to go ahead and merge after tests pass! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
503553184 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503553184 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzU1MzE4NA== | andrew-c-ross 5852283 | 2019-06-19T13:08:41Z | 2019-06-19T13:08:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have to say as someone who is probably an average user, inconsistencies between related projects, like xarray/pandas or matplotlib/seaborn, drive me nuts. But I also agree that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
503241583 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503241583 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzI0MTU4Mw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-06-18T17:49:03Z | 2019-06-18T17:49:03Z | MEMBER |
I'm ambivalent. I prefer the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 | |
503189754 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503189754 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzE4OTc1NA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-06-18T15:33:50Z | 2019-06-18T15:33:50Z | MEMBER | This looks great, thank you! One design question: should we stick with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add "errors" keyword argument to drop() and drop_dims() (#2994) 456971151 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3