issue_comments
12 rows where issue = 421029352 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- expose zarr caching from xarray · 12 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1246120311 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1246120311 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRkl3 | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-09-14T01:33:03Z | 2022-09-14T01:33:03Z | MEMBER | docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/user-guide/io.html seems great to me. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1246009657 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1246009657 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRJk5 | tasansal 13684161 | 2022-09-13T22:24:59Z | 2022-09-13T22:24:59Z | NONE | @dcherian, I will start a PR. Where do you think this belongs in the docs? Some places I can think of:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1246007312 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1246007312 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRJAQ | tasansal 13684161 | 2022-09-13T22:20:57Z | 2022-09-13T22:20:57Z | NONE | I couldn't get |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1246005938 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1246005938 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRIqy | rabernat 1197350 | 2022-09-13T22:18:31Z | 2022-09-13T22:18:31Z | MEMBER | Glad you got it working! So you're saying it does not work with
Yes, I think I experienced that as well. I think the entire cache is serialized and passed around between workers. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1246004791 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1246004791 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRIY3 | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-09-13T22:16:33Z | 2022-09-13T22:16:33Z | MEMBER | @tasansal a PR would be very welcome! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1245989599 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1245989599 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRErf | tasansal 13684161 | 2022-09-13T21:52:45Z | 2022-09-13T21:52:45Z | NONE | @rabernat Following up on the previous, yes it does work with the Zarr backend! I agree with @dcherian, we should add this to the docs. However, the behavior in Dask is strange. I think it is making each worker have its own cache and blowing up memory if I ask for a large cache. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1245417352 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1245417352 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KO4-I | tasansal 13684161 | 2022-09-13T13:30:08Z | 2022-09-13T13:58:55Z | NONE | @rabernat, yes, I have tried that like this: ```python from zarr.storage import FSStore, LRUStoreCache import xarray as xr path = "gs://prefix/object.zarr" store_nocache = FSStore(path) store_cached = LRUStoreCache(store_nocache, max_size=2**30) ds = xr.open_zarr(store_cached) ``` When I read the same data twice, it still downloads. Am I doing something wrong? While I wait for a response, I will try it again and update if it works, but the last time I checked, it didn't. Note to self: I also need to check it with Zarr backend and Dask backend. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1243935545 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1243935545 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KJPM5 | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-09-12T15:46:57Z | 2022-09-12T15:46:57Z | MEMBER |
This would be good to document! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1243823078 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1243823078 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KIzvm | rabernat 1197350 | 2022-09-12T14:25:39Z | 2022-09-12T14:25:39Z | MEMBER | I have successfully used the Zarr LRU cache with Xarray. You just have to initialize the Store object outside of Xarray and then pass it to Have you tried that? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
1243814673 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-1243814673 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KIxsR | tasansal 13684161 | 2022-09-12T14:20:01Z | 2022-09-12T14:20:01Z | NONE | Hi @rabernat, I looked at your PRs, and they seem to haven't gotten much attention. I tried using a store with LRUCache in For our use cases in https://github.com/TGSAI/mdio-python, we usually want to use any form of LRUCache (it doesn't have to be Zarr's necessarily).
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
472905515 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-472905515 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3MjkwNTUxNQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2019-03-14T15:02:22Z | 2019-03-14T15:02:22Z | MEMBER | I have created two PRs which attempt to provide zarr caching in different ways. I would welcome some advice on which one is a better approach. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 | |
472871184 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2812#issuecomment-472871184 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2812 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3Mjg3MTE4NA== | rabernat 1197350 | 2019-03-14T14:07:03Z | 2019-03-14T14:07:03Z | MEMBER | Or should we use xarray's own caching mechanism? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
expose zarr caching from xarray 421029352 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3