issue_comments
1 row where issue = 411365882 and user = 35968931 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Feature request: show units in dataset overview · 1 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 565407674 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2773#issuecomment-565407674 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2773 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NTQwNzY3NA== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-12-13T11:27:26Z | 2019-12-13T11:27:26Z | MEMBER | I would love to see this. What would we want the exact formatting to be? Square brackets to copy how units from There are now two cases to discuss: units in from @keewis on #3616:
We could presumably just extract the units from pint's repr to display them separately. I don't know if that raises questions about generality of duck-typing arrays though @dcherian ? Is it fine to make units a special-case? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Feature request: show units in dataset overview 411365882 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1