issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 396084551 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- rolling_exp (nee ewm) · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 454164295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2650#issuecomment-454164295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2650 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1NDE2NDI5NQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2019-01-14T21:16:08Z | 2019-01-14T21:16:08Z | MEMBER | @max-sixty
I remember I faced the same issue in implementing
I think it would make the code much cleaner at least for these methods. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
rolling_exp (nee ewm) 396084551 | |
| 452183122 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2650#issuecomment-452183122 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2650 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MjE4MzEyMg== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2019-01-08T05:46:50Z | 2019-01-08T05:46:50Z | MEMBER | I like BTW, does |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
rolling_exp (nee ewm) 396084551 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1