issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 393214032 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) · 9 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
453799948 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-453799948 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Mzc5OTk0OA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-13T03:54:07Z | 2019-01-13T03:54:07Z | MEMBER | I'm going to close this as the original issue (error in compression/codecs) has been resolved. @ktyle - I'd be happy to continue this discussion on the Pangeo issue tracker if you'd like to discuss optimal chunk layout more. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
451206728 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-451206728 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MTIwNjcyOA== | jhamman 2443309 | 2019-01-03T16:59:06Z | 2019-01-03T16:59:06Z | MEMBER | @ktyle - glad to hear things are moving for you. I'm pretty sure the last chunk in each of your datasets is smaller than the rest. So after concatenation, you end up with a small chunk in the middle and at the end of the time dimension. I bet if you used a chunk size of 172 (divides evenly into 2924), you wouldn't need to rechunk. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
450692965 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-450692965 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1MDY5Mjk2NQ== | ktyle 1961038 | 2018-12-31T21:44:39Z | 2018-12-31T21:44:39Z | NONE | Ok, thanks all for the advice. Clearly further subdivisions of the multi-level variables are in order. However, working with a single level (sea-level pressure) from our CFSR datasets, I find that if I specify the chunksize on the Time dimension when using xr.open_mfdataset, the to_zarr function fails on the resulting dataset with a "non-uniform chunksize" error. If, however, I take the resulting dataset and "re-chunk" with the .chunk method, although the two datasets "look identical", the to_zarr write succeeds. Link to notebook: https://nbviewer.jupyter.org/url/www.atmos.albany.edu/facstaff/ktyle/temp/Xarray_to_zarr_ex1.ipynb |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449184669 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449184669 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE4NDY2OQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-12-21T00:16:40Z | 2018-12-21T00:16:40Z | MEMBER |
Not a good idea in this case. The original 49GB chunks will still exist in the task graph and will have to be computed before the rechunking step. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449184291 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449184291 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE4NDI5MQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-12-21T00:14:22Z | 2018-12-21T00:14:22Z | MEMBER | You can also rechunk your dataset after the fact using the
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449151325 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449151325 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE1MTMyNQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-12-20T22:09:20Z | 2018-12-20T22:09:20Z | MEMBER | So the key information is this:
This says that your dask chunk size is 1460 x 32 x 361 x 720 (x 4 bytes for Furthermore, the dask chunks will be automatically mapped to zarr chunks by xarray. These zarr chunks would be much too big to be useful. Zarr docs say "at least 1MB". In my example notebook I recommeded 10-100 MB.) For both zarr and dask, you can think of a chunk as an amount of data that can be comfortably held in memory and passed around the network. (That's where the 10 - 100 MB estimate comes from.) It is also the minimum size of data that can be read from the dataset at once. Even if you only need one single value, the whole chunk needs to be read into memory and decompressed. I would recommend you chunk along the time dimension. You can accomplish by adding the I imagine that will fix most of your issues. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449146417 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449146417 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE0NjQxNw== | ktyle 1961038 | 2018-12-20T21:49:15Z | 2018-12-20T21:59:33Z | NONE | @rabernat Yeah I think the chunksize in the time dimension is too large: ```` <xarray.Dataset> Dimensions: (lat: 361, lev: 32, lon: 720, time: 2920) Coordinates: * lat (lat) float32 -90.0 -89.5 -89.0 -88.5 -88.0 ... 88.5 89.0 89.5 90.0 * lon (lon) float32 -180.0 -179.5 -179.0 -178.5 ... 178.5 179.0 179.5 * lev (lev) float32 1000.0 975.0 950.0 925.0 ... 50.0 30.0 20.0 10.0 * time (time) datetime64[ns] 2013-01-01 ... 2014-12-31T18:00:00 Data variables: g (time, lev, lat, lon) float32 dask.array<shape=(2920, 32, 361, 720), chunksize=(1460, 32, 361, 720)> ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449145011 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449145011 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE0NTAxMQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-12-20T21:43:40Z | 2018-12-20T21:43:40Z | MEMBER |
The syntax and an example for specifying a compressor is given in the docs here: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/latest/io.html#zarr-compressors-and-filters. It needs to be part of the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 | |
449144275 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2624#issuecomment-449144275 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2624 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0OTE0NDI3NQ== | rabernat 1197350 | 2018-12-20T21:40:44Z | 2018-12-20T21:40:44Z | MEMBER | @ktyle - it sounds like your chunks are too big. Can you post xarray's representation of your dataset before writing it to zarr? Call p.s. I edited your comment a bit to put the code into code blocks. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray to Zarr error (in compress / numcodecs functions) 393214032 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3