issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 384449698 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • shoyer · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • When is transpose not lazy? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
441742920 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2576#issuecomment-441742920 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2576 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MTc0MjkyMA== shoyer 1217238 2018-11-26T18:19:29Z 2018-11-26T18:19:29Z MEMBER

Transpose on arrays stored with dask is definitely always lazy. The docs are out of sync here -- I think this language predates the use of dask into xarray!

The language is referring to cases where you're loading data from disk with open_dataset() without using dask. Indexing is lazy in those cases, but not transpose.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   When is transpose not lazy? 384449698

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);