issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 383945783 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • max-sixty · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Xarray equivalent of np.place or df.map(mapping)? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
441483832 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2568#issuecomment-441483832 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2568 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ0MTQ4MzgzMg== max-sixty 5635139 2018-11-25T23:30:36Z 2018-11-25T23:30:36Z MEMBER

Agree that map is not a good name (and I find the pandas API difficult in this area - each time I'm looking up what relabel / rename / map / select / filter does)

How about match / switch / case?

We would definitely use this. I agree it'd probably be used less in xarray than in pandas; though I'm keen to expand the API, in a deliberate and careful way, to some of the traditional pandas use-cases (but a small vote among many)

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Xarray equivalent of np.place or df.map(mapping)? 383945783

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);