issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 37031948 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

issue 1

  • Use "XIndex" instead of "Index"? · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
48583490 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/178#issuecomment-48583490 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/178 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NTgzNDkw shoyer 1217238 2014-07-10T09:31:37Z 2014-07-10T09:31:37Z MEMBER

I guess I've come full circle on this one.

After trying it for a bit, I realized that having xray.Index as a subtly distinct variant of pandas.Index was a bad idea. Hence this issue.

But the name XIndex is awkward, new vocabulary. I don't think it's any better (for pandas users) than Coordinate.

So now I think it's like to switch back to Coordinate.

(at least I didn't release a version with that temporary name change!)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Use "XIndex" instead of "Index"? 37031948

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);