issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 341331807 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
issue 1
- Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
412410121 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-412410121 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxMjQxMDEyMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-08-13T05:12:05Z | 2018-08-13T05:12:05Z | MEMBER |
Not yet, unfortunately, but this is what https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2302 is trying to solve.
I think this would be the preferred approach. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects 341331807 | |
405420045 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-405420045 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTQyMDA0NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-07-17T00:18:58Z | 2018-07-17T00:18:58Z | MEMBER |
I think it would make more sense to think about using multiple |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects 341331807 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1