issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 33273199 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Dataset.groupby summary methods · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
42793076 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/122#issuecomment-42793076 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/122 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNzkzMDc2 | shoyer 1217238 | 2014-05-12T03:10:50Z | 2014-05-12T03:10:50Z | MEMBER | We currently don't implement methods like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.groupby summary methods 33273199 | |
42789957 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/122#issuecomment-42789957 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/122 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQyNzg5OTU3 | shoyer 1217238 | 2014-05-12T01:32:52Z | 2014-05-12T01:32:52Z | MEMBER | The problem is that it's ambiguous which array you would like to summarize. I suppose we could default to using all noncoordinates? That would be similar to how pandas does its DataFrame.groupby methods. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.groupby summary methods 33273199 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1