issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where issue = 319132629 sorted by updated_at descending

✖
✖

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 2

author_association 2

issue 1

  • avoid integer overflow when decoding large time numbers · 3 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
385661908 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2096#issuecomment-385661908 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2096 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTY2MTkwOA== j08lue 3404817 2018-05-01T12:41:08Z 2018-05-01T12:41:08Z CONTRIBUTOR

I'm confused. It seems that I did exactly this a while ago

@fmaussion don't be. You are perfectly right, we worked on the same line of code, only that I was about 50 PRs earlier, hence the merge conflict.

I'll close this.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   avoid integer overflow when decoding large time numbers 319132629
385658445 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2096#issuecomment-385658445 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2096 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTY1ODQ0NQ== fmaussion 10050469 2018-05-01T12:19:20Z 2018-05-01T12:19:20Z MEMBER

I'm confused. It seems that I did exactly this a while ago: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2015

Anyways, it seems that your issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1965 is a duplicate of https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2002 and was corrected by my PR. Or am I missing something here?

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   avoid integer overflow when decoding large time numbers 319132629
385624187 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2096#issuecomment-385624187 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2096 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM4NTYyNDE4Nw== j08lue 3404817 2018-05-01T08:26:45Z 2018-05-01T08:26:45Z CONTRIBUTOR

That single AppVeyor CI fail is because the py27 32bit conda environment cannot be created: ResolvePackageNotFound: - cftime

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   avoid integer overflow when decoding large time numbers 319132629

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);