issue_comments

Table actions

3 rows where issue = 295959111 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • shoyer · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • Representing & checking Dataset schemas · 3 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
938409463 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-938409463 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 IC_kwDOAMm_X8437v33 shoyer 1217238 2021-10-08T07:25:44Z 2021-10-08T07:25:44Z MEMBER

Pandera provides machine-readable schemas for Pandas and, as of version 0.7, panderas has decoupled pandera and pandas types to make pandera more useful for things like xarray. I haven't tried pandera yet but I plan to do some experiments soon.

Awesome -- would love to hear how this goes!

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111
364602759 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-364602759 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDYwMjc1OQ== shoyer 1217238 2018-02-09T23:53:49Z 2018-02-09T23:53:49Z MEMBER

ncdump -h (xarray.Dataset.info()) is one existing schema of sorts, but it's hardly machine readable.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111
364532198 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1900#issuecomment-364532198 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1900 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDUzMjE5OA== shoyer 1217238 2018-02-09T19:16:26Z 2018-02-09T19:16:26Z MEMBER

I think the right word for this may be "schema". For applications and models (rather than data analysis), these sort of conventions can be super-valuable. I like the idea of declarative spec that can be validated.

Just googling around, I came up with pandas-validator: https://github.com/c-data/pandas-validator 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Representing & checking Dataset schemas  295959111

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);