issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 29067976 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Ensure decoding as datetime64[ns] · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37505097 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/59#issuecomment-37505097 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/59 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NTA1MDk3 | shoyer 1217238 | 2014-03-13T06:58:15Z | 2014-03-13T06:58:15Z | MEMBER | If you're sure that 'time' is stored as |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ensure decoding as datetime64[ns] 29067976 | |
| 37434012 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/59#issuecomment-37434012 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/59 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NDM0MDEy | shoyer 1217238 | 2014-03-12T16:58:56Z | 2014-03-12T16:58:56Z | MEMBER | So I think the unfortunate reality is that np.datetime64 is still our best option. Otherwise we are left with dates as Python objects, which is painfully slow. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Ensure decoding as datetime64[ns] 29067976 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1