issue_comments
6 rows where issue = 282964952 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- 'Cookbook' page · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
563009527 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-563009527 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MzAwOTUyNw== | keewis 14808389 | 2019-12-08T23:31:08Z | 2019-12-08T23:31:08Z | MEMBER | the work done in the scipy sprints is on master now, with plans for new additions in #3564. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 | |
546269028 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-546269028 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NjI2OTAyOA== | jejjohnson 3642622 | 2019-10-25T09:01:33Z | 2019-10-25T09:01:33Z | NONE | I was wondering if this is still going to be a thing? I see a branch #1791 but it hasn't been merged. Plus I'm not sure what's the scope of the cookbook. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 | |
511124406 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-511124406 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTEyNDQwNg== | rabernat 1197350 | 2019-07-13T14:01:51Z | 2019-07-13T14:01:51Z | MEMBER | We will be focusing on this at the SciPy sprint. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 | |
355018267 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-355018267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1NTAxODI2Nw== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-01-03T14:00:50Z | 2018-01-03T14:00:50Z | MEMBER | The current Example section is a bit disorganized. Maybe the Cookbook could replace it, and the Gallery could become an independent section? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 | |
355017780 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-355017780 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1NTAxNzc4MA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-01-03T13:58:38Z | 2018-01-03T13:58:38Z | MEMBER |
Yes I agree that "Gallery" should be more a collection of plots than something else. The Parsing rasterio’s geocoordinates is something "in between": the actual message is how to parse the coordinates and would be better placed in a cookbook, while the plot is a nice side product and is well placed in the gallery... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 | |
352502314 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1790#issuecomment-352502314 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1790 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1MjUwMjMxNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-18T17:47:28Z | 2017-12-18T17:47:28Z | MEMBER | Sure, this seems like it could make for a nice addition to the docs! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
'Cookbook' page 282964952 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5